Singal argues below that "all of us" could have found ourselves in a circumstance resembling Tizon's situation. I did.
I spent a portion of my K-12 years wintering in a fishing village in the Alaskan bush, and attending a one-room school with a dozen pupils. There was a salmon cannery, closed except for a caretaker during the winter, a long walk from one end of the village. One spring a classmate told me, laughing, how a Filipino from the cannery had drawn his attention to a "McPie," that is, a magpie as pronounced in a Tagalog accent.
Decades later I had a Filipino supervisor,
who told me he had campaigned against the segregation of Filipinos in
Alaskan salmon canneries. I knew about them — the "Filipino
bunkhouse" in most Kodiak Island canneries — and never realized the
ethical problem. Nor did my classmate, himself an Alaska native. "We do what the people around us are doing, what our culture
is doing."
When one
realizes that what Arendt called "the banality of evil"(1) can touch any of
us, Singal's humane objection to the knee-jerk ideological
condemnation of Tizon's courageous last work, below, stands as
corrective to the present climate. Singal:
All of us — I really mean this; I really mean you and your family and everyone you love — could, in a different historical context, have been a slaver or a Holocaust-perpetrator or at the very least decided it wasn’t worth the trouble to contest these grotesque crimes. Because that’s the human condition: We don’t have easy access to a zoomed-out view of morality and empathy. We do what the people around us are doing, what our culture is doing.
I don't know about you, but the idealistic
teenager I was lived comfortably with the Filipino bunkhouse, because
everybody around me did.
(Excerpts (2) and (3) from Singal below.)
-*--
(1) In Eichmann in Jerusalem: "One doctor remarked that his overall attitude towards other people, especially his family and friends, was "highly desirable", while another remarked that the only unusual trait Eichmann displayed was being more "normal" in his habits and speech than the average person."
(2) "One of the key themes of Tizons’ article is that his family was, in many senses, almost a caricature of the striving, American-dream-seeking immigrant experience. They were normal. They were normal and yet they had a slave. To which one could respond, “Well, no, they’re not normal — they are deranged psychopaths to have managed to simply live for decades and decades with a slave under their roof. That is not something normal people do, and it’s wrong to portray it as such.”"
(3) "But the entire brutal weight of human history contradicts
this view. Normal people — people who otherwise have no signs of
derangement or a lack of a grip on basic human moral principles — do
evil stuff all the time. One could write
millions of pages detailing all the times when evil acts were
perpetrated, abetted, or not resisted by people who were, in every other
respect, perfectly normal. It’s safe to say, to a certain
approximation, that all of us — I really mean this; I really mean you
and your family and everyone you love — could, in a different historical
context, have been a slaver or a Holocaust-perpetrator or at the very
least decided it wasn’t worth the trouble to contest these grotesque
crimes. Because that’s the human condition: We don’t have easy access to
a zoomed-out view of morality and empathy. We do what the people around
us are doing, what our culture is doing."
No comments:
Post a Comment